Acquisition and developmental descriptions of consonants and vowels
Source:R/data.R
data_acq_consonants.Rd
This package provides dataframes of information about the consonants and
vowels in American English. The following datasets collect acquisition
(acq
) features which (try to) characterize the expected acquisition or
speech-motor difficulty of speech sounds. See also
data_features_consonants.
Details
Crowe and McLeod (2020) norms for English consonant acquisition
Crowe and McLeod (2020, below as the cm2020_
variables) provides a
systematic review and summary statistics for age of acquisition norms for
English consonants. They scoured the literature of acquisition ages for
individual consonants and computed summary statistics on them. They
considered just accuracy of sounds when produced in single words. Their
sources include a mix of a journal articles and norms for articulation
assessments. They do not weight statistics from individual studies by sample
size or sampling procedure.
I prepared the Crowe and McLeod (2020) data by copying the relevant numbers from their Table 2 making the following changes: 1) rounding mean and SD values to 1 decimal point (3 days for ages in months), 2) dropping /ʍ/, 3) using /r/, /g/, /tʃ/, /dʒ/ for IPA characters instead of the specialized characters used in the article.
The early 8, middle 8 and late 8 (Shriberg, 1993)
The English consonants are often broken down into three developmental classes, based on Shriberg (1993):
Early 8: m b j n w d p h
Middle 8: t ŋ k g f v tʃ dʒ,
Late 8: ʃ θ s z ð l r ʒ
This classification is included as the s93_eights
column.
From these names alone, we might interpret these classes such that sounds in the Early 8 would be acquired before the ones in the Middle 8, and likewise that the Middle 8 would be acquired before the Late 8. But these classes were not created by examining patterns of typical consonant acquisition.
For some context, Shriberg (1993) introduces the Early 8, Middle 8, and Late 8 data by describing the following panel of the article's Figure 7:
About which, Shriberg (1993) says: "The values for this trend, which is a profile of consonant mastery, were taken from a group of 64 3- to 6-year-old speech-delayed children Shriberg, Kwiatkowski, & Gruber, 1992). Severity of involvement of the 24 English consonants is represented as the percentage correct for each consonant sorted in decreasing order from left to right. Notice that the most obvious breaks in this function allow for a division of the 24 consonants into three groups of eight sounds termed the Early-8, averaging over 75% correct, the Middle-8, averaging 25%-75% correct, and the Late-8, including consonants averaging less than 25% correct in continuous conversational speech (/ʒ/ is infrequently represented in young, speech-delayed children's spontaneous conversational speech)."
So, there were 64 3–6-year-old children with speech delays, and consonant sounds were divided into three classes based on how often these children produced the sounds correctly on average in a conversational speech sample. This classification is not so much a measure of the relative ordering of speech sound development as it is the relative difficulty of these sounds for children with a speech delay of unknown origin. It would be more appropriate to replace the levels of Early/Middle/Late with Easy/Medium/Hard.
Consonant acquisition features
data_acq_consonants
provides the following features:
knitr::kable(data_acq_consonants)
phone | cmubet | wiscbet | cm2020_90_age_mean | cm2020_90_age_sd | cm2020_90_age_min | cm2020_90_age_max | cm2020_90_num_studies | cm2020_90_stage | s93_eights |
p | P | p | 33.2 | 6.9 | 24 | 48 | 12 | early | early |
b | B | b | 31.4 | 7.8 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
t | T | t | 38.5 | 9.2 | 24 | 60 | 13 | early | middle |
d | D | d | 35.7 | 6.7 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
k | K | k | 37.7 | 7.3 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | middle |
g | G | g | 36.8 | 6.6 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | middle |
tʃ | CH | tsh | 53.5 | 10.7 | 36 | 72 | 12 | middle | middle |
dʒ | JH | dzh | 51.0 | 11.8 | 36 | 72 | 13 | middle | middle |
m | M | m | 33.2 | 6.7 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
n | N | n | 33.1 | 7.4 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
ŋ | NG | ng | 40.3 | 10.8 | 24 | 55 | 10 | early | middle |
f | F | f | 38.3 | 6.3 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | middle |
v | V | v | 50.8 | 10.8 | 36 | 66 | 12 | middle | middle |
θ | TH | th | 77.0 | 7.4 | 72 | 96 | 10 | late | late |
ð | DH | dh | 69.0 | 11.3 | 54 | 96 | 12 | late | late |
s | S | s | 51.3 | 16.3 | 24 | 84 | 12 | middle | late |
z | Z | z | 56.8 | 14.3 | 30 | 84 | 11 | middle | late |
ʃ | SH | sh | 55.0 | 10.5 | 36 | 72 | 12 | middle | late |
ʒ | ZH | zh | 70.7 | 12.2 | 60 | 84 | 3 | late | late |
h | HH | h | 35.0 | 7.0 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
l | L | l | 53.8 | 10.4 | 24 | 60 | 12 | middle | late |
r | R | r | 66.6 | 18.6 | 30 | 96 | 12 | late | late |
w | W | w | 35.2 | 6.8 | 24 | 48 | 13 | early | early |
j | Y | j | 45.8 | 11.0 | 30 | 60 | 13 | early | early |
Description of each column:
- phone
phone in IPA
- cmubet
phone in the CMU alphabet
- wiscbet
phone in an older system used by our lab
- cm2020_90_age_mean, cm2020_90_age_sd, cm2020_90_age_min, cm2020_90_age_max
Age of acquisition statistics reported by Crowe & McLeod (2020). Statistics are the mean, SD, min and max age (in months) when children reached 90% accuracy on a consonant.
- cm2020_90_num_studies
Number of studies used by Crowe & McLeod (2020) to compute the corresponding statistics.
- cm2020_90_stage
Developmental stage assigned to the consonant by Crowe & McLeod (2020). Sounds with an
age_mean
before 48 months areearly
, before 60 months aremiddle
, and of 60 or older arelate
.- s93_eights
Developmental stage of Shriberg (1993)—that is, the
early
8,middle
8 andlate
8 consonants.
References
Crowe, K., & McLeod, S. (2020). Children’s English Consonant Acquisition in the United States: A Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(4), 2155–2169. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00168
Shriberg, L. D. (1993). Four New Speech and Prosody-Voice Measures for Genetics Research and Other Studies in Developmental Phonological Disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(1), 105–140. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3601.105